Toolhead or Systems Thinker – You Choose
- May 9th, 2011
- Posted in Systems Thinking Concepts . Systems Thinking and Contact Centers . Systems Thinking and Education . Systems Thinking and Financial Industry . Systems Thinking and Government . Systems Thinking and Healthcare . Systems Thinking and Management . Systems Thinking and Technology
- Write comment
I recently read an article by one of the management fad proponents that even
though they used tools they were a systemic thinker. Further review and reading determined they provided no evidence of systemic thinking in the work they had done. Where is the evidence? None existed.
The use of tools offers problems I have written about before. I wrote about it in my recent Quality Digest column – Are You a Sheet or Shelf Thinker? Tools limit thinking and create a barrier to systemic and breakthrough thinking.
Systems thinking (and more specifically, the Vanguard Method) is about method and innovation. It addresses the management thinking that has to be challenged because of the assumptions that lead service organizations in the wrong direction. The functional separation of work, targets, financials, hierarchy, technology, information are but a small sample of items that need to be challenged.
So, part of systems thinking is about addressing not just the design, but the management of the work. Management thinking drives the design. The management fads claim to do this too, but look for the evidence . . . lots of hat, but no cattle. Pathetic and misleading.
Managers have a choice too, they can pick assumptions or knowledge. Knowledge requires context to all those management reports with meaningless data. One can only get that in the work.
Toolhead activities support status quo in management. Most don’t know better, but many believe that someday if they see the benefit of tools management will buy-in over time. The benefit never comes in sufficient quantity to convince management and management relegates the improvement fads to lower and middle management or the front-line. A dead-end for sure.
Unless efforts to optimize systems include management . . . it is better not to start. Systems thinking includes everyone and everything, not just the elitist or toolheads wreaking havoc on the systems. This is not business improvement, it is more waste and sub-optimization in the system.
Good video of former toolheads that have found a better way:
I used to be a toolhead but I am alright now (short video 4 mins) from The Systems Thinking Review on Vimeo.
Tripp Babbitt is a speaker, blogger and consultant to service industry (private and public). His organization helps executives find a better way to make the work work. Read his articles at Quality Digest and his column for CustomermanagementIQ.com Download free from www.newsystemsthinking.com “Understanding Your Organization as a System” and gain knowledge of systems thinking or contact us about our intervention services at info@newsystemsthinking.com. Reach him on Twitter at www.twitter.com/TriBabbittor LinkedIn at www.linkedin.com/in/trippbabbitt.



There was an article in Harvard Business Review a few years ago where ‘fads’ were tested for business benefit. None was found. I’ll see if I can get the reference and post it here.
Article is:
Nohria, N., Joyce, W., Roberson, B., “What Really Works” Harvard Business Review, July 2003. Quoted by Douglas Hubbard in The Failure of Risk Management. Review of that at: http://eight2late.wordpress.com/2010/02/11/the-failure-of-risk-management-a-book-review/
How does a tool limiting thinking? Only if you are a limited thinker, I say.
Does a hammer limit your thinking?
A tool is neither good or bad, it depends on how you use it.
Toyota uses tools. They are also systems thinkers, wouldn’t you agree? That is my experience.
I don’t understand why you complain so much about tools.
Funny you should ask, I wrote an article about this in Quality Digest. http://bit.ly/mIpxcz
Toyota developed certain tools for solving problems they had in manufacturing. Service has different problems. All systems are different and copying one to the other makes little sense, except those looking to copy. Never a good idea.